|
It is pretty obvious that jet fuel hydrocarbons did not blow up the two WTC
towers because none of the necessary footprints were present. However,
footprints and signs of other alternate possibilities
were in fact present.
Any argument presenting a point of view can be
convincing but not conclusive. A similar argument form a different point of
view can likewise be convincing but not conclusive. The two presented together
to re-enforce each other can sometimes be all but conclusive. Two such follow
here.
The first is an article is from:
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/911_attack/news.php?q=1229467809
December 14, 2008
1.
WTC 9/11 EVIDENCE
-
Seismic Record: the energy budget recorded in the seismic record on the day
of 9/11 and the collapse of the buildings did not reflect the mass of
building materials involved in the collapse, nor the nearly freefall of the
collapsing buildings. The seismic record demonstrates an event on the scale
of a quarry blast. WHERE WAS THE THUD?
- Kinetic Energy: two robust buildings with very robust steel beam
reinforcement would release a sizeable amount of kinetic energy from the
buildings falling that would be all of the energy that went into the
construction of the buildings. The release of that amount of kinetic energy
is not reflected in the physical evidence on the seismic record. Into what
physical process did that kinetic energy go?
- Molecular Dissociation: the collapse of the buildings produced the
highest mass per volume of very fine particles (nanoparticles) ever measured
in an air sample in the United States. It takes a tremendous amount of
energy to dissociate or break the molecular bonds of steel, concrete and
other building materials that were "powdered" into very fine particles
during the collapse of the buildings. The largest mass per volume of METALS
ever measured in an air sample in the US were reported by Dr. Thomas Cahill
who did air monitoring for 5 months. Metal is used in buildings because it
is very strong and would require large amounts of energy to reduce it to
nanoparticles. Chemical explosives do not release enough energy to produce
that volume of very fine particles. A much more energetic process was
involved such as laser or beam energy which releases focused and
concentrated energy as complex waveforms necessary to cause molecular
dissociation.
- Physical Evidence of Buildings Collapsing: in videos of the collapses
on 9/11 the WTC buildings erupted into emulsion like a drinking fountain,
and the rubble did not hit the ground. Even on tape huge pieces of aluminum
building siding vaporized as they were freefalling, and never hit the
ground.
This was not all a controlled demolition!
- Detritus Pile: should be 1/3 the height of the building The 100+ story
buildings were about 1 story high when the collapse of the buildings ended.
A fireman on one of the news videos said the antenna that had been on the of
B. 1 was on the top of a pile of rubble about one story high. The rubble
pile should have been 35 stories if it was a conventional controlled
demolition.
- Rubble Never Hit the Ground this defies gravity, where did the rubble
go?
- Footprints - Geometrically Round Holes: contiguous round holes 24' in
diameter were in the footprints of the WTC buildings 1 and 2, and a 60' deep
geometrically round hole was in the middle of Liberty Street near the WTC.
This is evidence of beam weapons. There was NO debris inside the footprints
of the two WTC buildings
only bare dirt with circles in the dirt.
- Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab Beam Weapon Demo: in 1955 the microwave
oven was invented and was a concept for a beam weapon.
In the summer of 1990, I observed a demonstration of the Livermore Shiva
laser facility in the middle of the night. A 16' diameter amber colored beam
was shot straight up into the sky from the lab and all air traffic was
diverted for a 5 mile radius during the demonstration. When I asked a grad
student working at the laser facility what they were trying to do, he said
"Make a star". I knew that could not be true because lasers are used to
molecularly dissociate materials by releasing tremendous amounts of energy
as very advanced and complex waveforms. Livermore had long been involved in
development of HAARP since 1978 in secret collaboration with the Soviet
Union, AND advanced beam weapons.
- Dust: in videos of the collapse larger particles fell and cascaded down
from the buildings under the forces of gravity, but before they hit the
ground they vaporized and suddenly went up into the atmosphere like an
antigravity demonstration. Nanoparticles are so tiny that they are not
subject to the forces of gravity, so molecular dissociation occurred on the
larger particles as they were freefalling, reducing them into nano-particles
(0.1 microns in diamater and smaller) which suddenly obeyed other physical
laws quantum mechanics. More evidence of HAARP/beam weapon technology
applied during collapse.
- Satellite photos: showed dust going into upper atmosphere which had
to be nanoparticles and may have been enhanced
by other technology because most very fine particles/dust would stay in the
Troposphere and be rained out in 2 months as we know from depleted uranium
particulate releases from battlefield already.
- 1400 Toasted Cars: located
blocks from the WTC buildings, with door handles missing, engine blocks
missing, blistering on some parts of the car finish, strange rust patterns
on the bodies of the cars.
- Paper Around Cars Not Burned:
whatever "vaporized" the engine blocks and the door handles on 1400 cars did
not ignite fragile and flammable paper lying all over the ground around the
cars. If engine blocks and door handles selectively vaporized, why didn't
body of car vaporize?
- Pile of Cars Spontaneously Combusted: in a news video, the entire pile
of cars started burning spontaneously at the same time with no visible
cause, it was not a fire that started in one car and spread to others.
- Rust Occurred Immediately: on cars and trucks, and in FEMA photos there
was heavy rust on STEEL beams steel does not rust, and it is a slow
oxidation process that results in rusting of iron. This rusting happened
immediately.
- Basements Of WTC Buildings Undamaged: stuffed mannequins in the
basement with clothing on were carried out of the basement undamaged. If a
100+-story building collapsed into its basement and left a 35-story rubble
pile, there would be nothing left in the basement. Even streetcars
underground at the WTC were pulled out after the collapse and had no damage.
- Prof. Cahill Air Monitoring Samples: the hardest and most durable
materials vaporized (steel, concrete etc), and the most fragile materials
(paper) cascading out of windows and all over the ground for blocks were
undamaged
- Truckloads of Potting Soil: right after the WTC disaster, the ground
was "fuming", and sequential FEMA aerial photos show 130 dumptrucks FULL of
soil (filled almost to the top of the dumptruck space) covered with tarps so
that the dirt in the trucks was not visible to onlookers on the street,
coming INTO the WTC area, dumping the soil and going out for more. This
happened even before the rescues or cleanup started and it continued for
some time. The piles of soil were left for a week and got higher each day in
sequential photos. The soil "fuming" lasted until March 2002 (8 months).
- Where Were All the WTC Bodies?: Emergency Room MDs Dr. Tony Daher and
Dr. Lincoln Cleaver were interviewed on TV on 9/11 about the casualties.
They said there weren't any after about noon on 9/11, no more casualties
came to the ER. Firemen saw NO BODIES but talked about the antenna on top of
building 1 that was at ground level on top of about one story of rubble.
- Boots Disintegrated: on emergency responders after 2 hours. They had to
get new boots every 2 hours molecular dissociation. It was not from
burning, their skin would have been damaged.
- NO FIRES IN BUILDINGS: William
Rodriguez, Senior Janitor at WTC said there were no fires in the buildings.
He conducted rescue efforts, saved injured workers and had keys to every
lock in both buildings.
- No Ground Fuming During Rain:
For 99 days the "burning" (fuming) continued at the WTC site, but when it
rained there was no fuming. If it had been fires burning, the rain would
have caused steam from heating rainwater.
- USGS: Iron versus Steel: the USGS analyzed the mineral form
of the rust on steel beams and iron objects at the WTC. They did not address
the "steel does not rust" issue, but dodged it by referring to the rusted
steel beams in the rubble pile as "iron beams" and gave mineral analyses of
IRON minerals produced by oxidation.
- Official Sample Data Not Reliable: spectral absorption images at the
WTC indicated average particle size was about 1 micron, which is subjected
to gravity and would have fallen with the collapsed buildings. USGS did not
collect many dust samples and collecting samples by other different agencies
did not agree with each other. No samples were taken at the toasted cars.
- Beam Weapon Evidence: was present at the top of the WTC buildings as
'lathering up' started before buildings started
coming down. 'Lathering up' in videos preceded the collapse of all
buildings, even Building 7 which supposedly Larry Silverstein when he said
"Pull it" to firefighters meant controlled demolition. Color alteration and
modification in news videos compared to other photos/videos at tops of
buildings indicates "doctoring" of images.
When the Seattle Dome was destroyed with controlled demolition, the dust
created by the destruction did not get any higher than the top of the
building. The WTC dust got into the upper atmosphere almost immediately
which indicates VERY TINY atmospheric dust sized particles (0.1 micron and
smaller), in fact smaller than atmospheric dust which stays mainly in the
Troposphere.
- "Lathering Up" Incriminating:
Building 7 "lathered up" even before B. 2 went down. B7 not damaged at all
by B. 2 going down right next to each other.
- Freon tanks very odd, large tanks removed from WTC building and OSHA
made bogus statement about what and why they were removed. Was freon used in
takedown? A NYC cop I met with Cindy Sheehan said he was injured in B. 7 and
removed on a gurney, but his eyes were covered so he could not see anything
as they left the building. He reported he was able to see dead bodies lying
all over the floor as he was being carried out BEFORE building 7 had
collapsed. Was this due to Freon asphyxiation put through ventilation
system like in recent Russian submarine disaster?
- Minneapolis Bridge Collapse: similarities to WTC disaster, every bridge
segment failed at exactly the same time instead of domino effect after first
collapse. This defies the laws of engineering. It should have been one
place failed and sequential domino-like failures followed for a normal
engineering collapse.
911 Blog Forum Comment: We stand at the beginning of a new age. Our
government has in its hands a method of disrupting the molecular basis for
matter [HAARP/beam weapons], and its first impulse was to weaponize it. Is
this so hard to understand? Like splitting atoms to create destruction was
it hard to understand in 1945? [HAARP - the new and improved model]
Of course this new "invention" came when the United States ruled supreme. A
weapon system of vast new power comes in time and we don't have an enemy
worthy of it, so naturally we use it on ourselves, 'Wag the Dog'.
These arguments of themselves are indicative but not
conclusive. But when added to the following they become quite persuasive.
2.
This second part was originally presented in
Waftit on November 29, 2008 under the title 'What Blew Up the WTC'. The
original presentation advocated the use of nukes, and mentioned the anomaly
of a shaft of light which appeared for four seconds through the explosion
cloud at the beginning of the explosion. In the context of the above, the
shaft of light takes on a far more relevant significance.
In the images below, Figures 1 and 2 are
photographs of two small underground nuclear blasts. They characteristically
show an upward blast of material, plus debris off to the side like octopus
arms.
Figures 3, 4, and 4 of the World Trade Center
shows the exact same characteristic trademarks.
Similarly, radioactivity in air creates shades
of brown. Figure 5 clearly shows the brown coloring of a nuclear blast in
the updraft portion. Figures 6 and 7, from another angle shows the cloud beginning
to form. If the blast had been of hydrocarbon origin, the color
would have been between blackish and greyish depending on the amount of
oxygen available. Whereas a nuclear blast does not need oxygen.
As Figures 3, 4, and 5 also clearly show, the
expulsed material is pulverized concrete dust and steel, similar to the
pulverized dust in Figures 1 and 2. No other explosive in the Science annuls
can pulverise concrete or iron to dust except supposed high tech IMF
devices.
Similarly, the upwards bursts in the pictures
are not possible by a gravitational collapse for the obvious reason that
everything gets blown outwards sideways by the collapsing weight and air
pressures over head. Or from the cutting charges used to help the collapse
which are used horizontally.
Figures 6 to 24 are screen captures of a four
second gap out of the first few seconds of the blast showing what appears to
be a shaft of light coming down from above. Which becomes briefly uncovered
by the smoke then masked again. The time signature at the bottom right of
every image shows the time frame.
Also relevant in figures Figure 19 to 24, a quickly billowing darker smoke cloud starting at the base of the light
shaft, which eventually masks over the light shaft, continues morphing into
the brown smoke cloud seen clearly in Figure 5 and 25, where Figures 5 and
25 also show evidence of demolition blasts.
Also as clearly seen by referencing the bottom
of the light shaft to the top of the first column at the left in the
building in the foreground, the shaft moves from right to left.
Note also that in figs. 3, 4,and 5 there are
no traces of the characteristic orange blooms of a kerosene blast
As sad as it may be, the truth is that which
is so. The eye is no fool. These are barefaced
visible proofs of the use of both a nuke and an EMF device and not of
exploding kerosene which any eye can see.
The source of Figures 1 to 5 is website:
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/finn/5/soldier5.htm
The source of Figures 6 to 26 is Youtube
video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qI3Qs0TQVQU, starting at 1:38. |
