|
Figure 1
The official version is that the
remaining jet fuel, after burning nearly an hour, finally exploded starting the collapse
of WTC2. The problem is that jet fuel doesn't explode, it
bursts into flame. The reason is that jet fuel is specially batched so as to not
explode so that crashed airlines don't blow into smithereens.
Whatever exploded
couldn't have been jet fuel. Furthermore, if it was
a petrochemical based explosion as alleged, as the three images from three
different perspectives there is not even a trace of exploding flames. How could that be.
Figure 2
In fact, the perspectives all show a thundering
linear upward blast devoid of flame,
characteristic of a micro nuke such as the Shrake
Nevada test blast shown in fig. 2.
Figure 3
The resulting
steel beams were cut into neat little segments. If the building had collapsed
solely under the effect of gravity as the official line has it, they would
have ended up as long twisted strands of steel tangled together like a giant
heap of spaghetti.
Similarly, the ends of the beams clearly
show that the neat cuts are at angles with gobs of melted steel dripping down. Jet fuel burns at
it's hottest at less than half the temperature needed to melt tempered steel. In
controlled demolitions the structural beams are cut every couple of floors downwards at an angle toward
the center of the building. Thermite is usually used. This way when the bottom
part of a beam segment is cut out by the Thermite, the bottom of the segment
slides inwards towards the center, drawing everything into the center after it. This way
the collapse is coaxed to pour into the center into the building's footprint to
order to leave the surrounding buildings unscathed.
Figure 4
When a building collapses under its own weight, the outer
shell splays out onto the surrounding area. You don't need physics to figure out
that one out. Just put some baking flour on a table and slap it with your
hand. It is impossible for a freely collapsing building to suck the material
inward unless helped by inward slanting demolition cuts on the steel work.
Otherwise the entirety of physics as it has been known since the time of Newton
would have to be rewritten. Figure 4 shows some large remaining end structure
pieces leaning inward
and not outward, clearly proving that demolition and not gravity was the cause of the collapse.
Wafted b y
- Anonymous
Posted on October 5, 2:05 pm
|
